<-- Effectiveness Tests


Pender Harbour Aquatic Centre
British Columbia


Test Dates: Feb 23, 1998, to Mar 16, 1998
Pool Type: Indoor 1500 sq.ft.
Electric Heated

RAW DATA

Week #1 - Feb 23 to Mar 2

No HEAT$AVR no blanket, readings taken at noon
Makeup water - 3 hours total (Feb 24,27, & 28) backwashed on Feb 27

Feb 23 Mar 2 Total Hours Kilowatt Hours
Meter #1 362.4 401.6 39.2 1176
Meter #2 359.1 529.1 170 5100
Total Energy used 6276




Week #2 - Mar 2 to Mar 9

Blanket was used, readings taken at noon
Makeup water - 2 hours total (Mar 3 & 6) backwashed on Mar 6

Mar 2 Mar 9 Total Hours Kilowatt Hours
Meter #1 401.6 411.9 10.3 309
Meter #2 529.1 657.1 128 3840
Total Energy used 4149




Week #3 - Mar 9 to Mar 16

HEAT$AVR was used, readings taken at noon
Makeup water - 4 hours total (Mar 9, 10, 13 & 14) backwashed on Mar 13

Mar 9 Mar 16 Total Hours Kilowatt Hours
Meter #1 411.9 444.2 32.3 969
Meter #2 657.1 796.3 139.2 4176
Total Energy used 5145




ENERGY SAVINGS - Gross per week

Energy Used % Saved $ Saved*
No blanket, no HEAT$AVR 6276 KWH 0 0
With HEAT$AVR 5145 KWH 18 78.49
With blanket 4149 KWH 34 147.61

* electricity cost of $0.0694/KWH taxes included

ENERGY SAVINGS - Gross per 50 week year

No blanket, no HEAT$AVR $0
With HEAT$AVR $3,924.50
With blanket $7,380.69

There are certain costs associated with achieving the savings above whether a blanket or HEAT$AVR is chosen. Blankets cost money to buy and worker time to put on and take off. HEAT$AVR cost money too and the auto injection system has an initial cost and a 7 year lifespan.



ENERGY SAVINGS - Gross per week

HEAT$AVR Blanket
Purchase cost/year $518.00 $1,140.00
HEAT$AVR pump/year $65.00 $0.00
Employee wages* $0.00 $1,467.00
Total $583.00 $2,607.00

Wages: 20 min/day @ $12.70, HEAT$AVR at regular retail cost/98, blanket at current tax in quote of $3420 and testimated lifespan of three years, HEAT$AVR pump at retail with taxes and estimated lifespan of seven years.



NET SAVINGS USING HEAT$AVR OR A BLANKET

Utilization cost/yr Gross saving Net saving
Nothing $0.00 $.00 $0.00
HEAT$AVR ($518.00) $3,924.50 $3,406.50
Blanket ($2,607.00) $7,380.69 $4,773.69




CONCLUSION

Based on this test, it can be stated that large amounts of money can be saved by using either a standard pool blanket or HEAT$AVR. The pool blanket is more effective by $1,367.19 per year. A decision must also take into account the cost of blanket rollers and the deck space they consume.

Error Possibility

In the raw data it must be noted that there were four hours of makeup water during the week that HEAT$AVR was tested as compared to 2 with the blanket and 3 with nothing at all. It is likely that this extra makeup water on Mar. 9 relates to the previous two weeks and has skewed the effectiveness of HEAT$AVR slightly. Looking at the raw data for the #1 meter suggests that conservatively, 10 hours of heater time per week has been added to the HEAT$AVR data. This is $1,041.00 of electricity per year. (50 weeks X 10 hours X 30 KWH X $0.0694)


<-- Effectiveness Tests